May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a superb alternative to a traditional ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it’s Puff Bar Flavors a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we are exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar will not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that people who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert that allows one to put it into your mouth, therefore you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco in to the marketplace.
Plus the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes that you can buy could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government may have a point. There’s currently no requirement for tobacco companies to include warning labels on their products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.